Girl With The Curls

Girl With The Curls
Observations of a Quixotic Femme Noire __One Percent - 1%__ Warrior-woman; a Valkyrie. I'll always be yours. Always...and never.



Are You HOT or NOT?

The current mood of ambercyn@yahoo.com at www.imood.com

Lyrics Search



This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?



ARCHIVES
04.2001 05.2001 06.2001 07.2001 08.2001 09.2001 10.2001 11.2001 12.2001 01.2002 03.2002 04.2002 05.2002 06.2002 07.2002 08.2002 09.2002 11.2002 01.2003 03.2003 04.2003 05.2003 08.2003 03.2004 04.2004 05.2004 07.2004 11.2004 12.2004 01.2005 02.2005 03.2005 04.2005 05.2005 06.2005 07.2005 08.2005 09.2005 10.2005 11.2005 12.2005 01.2006 02.2006 04.2006 05.2006 10.2006 11.2006 01.2007 02.2007 06.2007 07.2007 08.2007 11.2007 12.2007 05.2008 09.2008 10.2008 11.2008


Saturday, April 28, 2001
Last Week I heard about the new Bill that has passed in "The House. The vote on H.R. 503, The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2001 . The vote on the legislation, sponsored by Rep. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., was 252 to 172, with 198 Republicans, 53 Democrats and one independent voting for it, and 21 Republicans, 150 Democrats and one independent voting against it. The measure would apply only to crimes in federal jurisdictions, but 24 states have similar laws. State supreme courts and one federal appeals court have upheld state statutes that make it a criminal offense to kill or injure a fetus. The House passed Graham’s legislation by a nearly identical margin in 1999, but former President Clinton threatened to veto it and the Senate took no action on the bill. This year its prospects look better since President Bush has indicated he would sign it into law. Senate Republican leaders have not yet indicated when they will take up the legislation, however. Graham said his bill “was written to preserve existing abortion law” and would not authorize the prosecution of women or doctors for having or performing a legal abortion. Calling Graham’s bill “clearly unconstitutional,” Democrat Eleanor Holmes Norton, the non-voting House delegate who represents the District of Columbia, said “it defines the fetus as a person in direct, in-your-face violation of Roe vs. Wade.”


While on one hand, YES I DO want a law "to make it a crime under federal and military law for a someone to attack a pregnant woman and harm her unborn child"(per article Graham Bill Passes House of Representatives ), at the same time...it DOES seem like it is going in the direction to make abortion illegal. Sure, they are going to exempt "abortion doctors" (what MOST people would call OB/GYN's), but for how long...is it only a matter of time that the bill could be made a law that could make abortion illegal?

I wonder how many women have chairs in the House of Representatives?

This is a puzzling situation. On one hand, it is protecting mothers who desire to have children but it could be changed so that women don't have a choice of keeping a child or not. We can only see and hope that this will be to EVERYONE'S mutual advantage. If it gets out of hand, we will have to be ready to stand, be counted and refuse to allow women "no choice."

Here's to hopin` the Human Race doesn't fuck upand put us back in the "Dark Ages."

holla@me


Comments: Post a Comment



site & contents © 2001 - 2007 A~Cyn

I have tons-o-fun with Aeolion, my Rainbow Quiggle at http://www.neopets.com
My beautiful desert aisha, slewfootsue resides at NeoPets; http://www.neopets.com
Strawberry Fields Forever gelert,Geleresa_yupitzme was adopted at NeoPets; http://www.neopets.com
I adopted Heaven_Swordsman the shoryu, then transformed him to a pteri at http://www.neopets.com
I adopted the abandoned -Gandou2000- at http://www.neopets.com
I adopted, nursed back to health and keep the former slave GrEEliGk at http://www.neopets.com
I adopted, accidentally transfomed OOhmm from a grundo to a chomby and purposely to a meerca at http://www.neopets.com